Skip to main content

Sen. Johnson,
Have you read the Constitution of the United States? There is a clause that prohibits foreign involvement with our political process. I know it is a fuzzy (not specific) wording, but it is there for some pretty good reasons. most important is to limit foreign influence in our political process. You do not think that Pres. Trump has done anything like that, but there is a lot of circumstantial evidence otherwise. Mr. Mueller indicated that he thought there were problems with the political process during the 2016 election. I understand that the president is on your team, but this is not a football game (trash talking the other team), you should be trying to find out what happened for the good of our nation.
Now with Ukraine there is more, and it is embarrassing our country, especially your party and the president. It is terrible that you think it is ok for the president to use appropriated funds for partisan politics. I hear that we have just done that, or something like that, with Turkey, and that is ok. But not for partisan help.
It is like your party figures if it can not win playing by the rules, cheat. I do not think this is how you see yourself, but it is how people see the president. Do you want to be seen to be like him?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

http://www.gmtoday.com/news/front/topstory026.asp I would like to know what the whistleblower said that the president thought was 'incorrect?'  It was a transcript, so it must have been what the president was saying in fact, or is black white?  Maybe the complaint what was said not as it was intended, but, sometimes, the president denies the obvious to his own glory.  I have not read the transcript or the whistleblower complaint, but the general consensus is that the president was breaking the law.  I have read elsewhere that the president said the whistleblower is a spy & this is a Democratic plot to do him in.  Do the employees of the government, especially Central Intelligence  Agency employees, have to take an oath supporting the Constitution and laws of the country?  If this person did take the oath, would what he did be part of upholding his oath?
Post a Comment
Read more
Speaking of how much or how far Sen. Johnson will go in support of Pres. Trump, I wonder how he squares Pres. Trump's helping women get abortions with his own or his parties stand on abortion? I do suppose it is possible that the president and his immediate family has not had anything to do with any women getting abortions, but if you believe that I have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell to you. I, personally know of a handful of women who have had to obtain abortions, and I am sure there were options they could have chosen other than abortion, but they did not. As a good libertarian, I am not in a position to tell them no.
Post a Comment
Read more
      As the impeachment story rolls on, I would like to have Sen. Johnson answer a simple yes or no question. Should a public officeholder use his office to enhance his reelection? If I remember right, this was the situation that caused Chuck Chvala so many problems.      There is a lot about Pres. Trump that has incited a lot of problems for our country, our image not the least, as well as trade and relations with our neighbors, Mexico & Canada, so let us pare it down to this question. I suppose that Sen. Johnson could claim that Pres. Trump was not doing partisan politics during the phone call to Ukraine. That just calls into question Sen. Johnson's perception, or his unquestioning support of a president doing whatever he can to get reelected. It may be that Sen. Johnson could say that it is not an impeachable crime, but, as noted above, the legal system disagrees with him. The president should not be above the law. If this o...
Post a Comment
Read more