Skip to main content
      As the impeachment story rolls on, I would like to have Sen. Johnson answer a simple yes or no question. Should a public officeholder use his office to enhance his reelection? If I remember right, this was the situation that caused Chuck Chvala so many problems.
     There is a lot about Pres. Trump that has incited a lot of problems for our country, our image not the least, as well as trade and relations with our neighbors, Mexico & Canada, so let us pare it down to this question. I suppose that Sen. Johnson could claim that Pres. Trump was not doing partisan politics during the phone call to Ukraine. That just calls into question Sen. Johnson's perception, or his unquestioning support of a president doing whatever he can to get reelected. It may be that Sen. Johnson could say that it is not an impeachable crime, but, as noted above, the legal system disagrees with him. The president should not be above the law. If this offense is deemed not worthy of impeachment, he would be placed above the law.
      I will send off this letter to Sen. Johnson, but as a write in candidate to replace him, he ignores my letters, so I put this out to newspapers, and my blog, to publicize my queries and opinions.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

http://www.gmtoday.com/news/front/topstory026.asp I would like to know what the whistleblower said that the president thought was 'incorrect?'  It was a transcript, so it must have been what the president was saying in fact, or is black white?  Maybe the complaint what was said not as it was intended, but, sometimes, the president denies the obvious to his own glory.  I have not read the transcript or the whistleblower complaint, but the general consensus is that the president was breaking the law.  I have read elsewhere that the president said the whistleblower is a spy & this is a Democratic plot to do him in.  Do the employees of the government, especially Central Intelligence  Agency employees, have to take an oath supporting the Constitution and laws of the country?  If this person did take the oath, would what he did be part of upholding his oath?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7495649/Donald-Trump-says-Nobel-Peace-Prize-gave-fairly.html I am sure that anyone willing to blow another country off the map deserves a Nobel Peace prize, or maybe not.  But no matter, he could probably buy one like he did for his Purple Heart, with just as much meaning behind his acquiring it.  This, by the way, is how he creates his 'machismo' with all those super-models.  Ya know, if you can not earn it, buy it.
I have heard that the National Rifle Association has tax exempt status. Why is that? I find it hard to believe that they deserve it, unless you think it is a religious organization. I do not approve of their propaganda about guns, and do not think that they deserve being tax exempt.