Rape
I
must confess that I do not know anything about this subject. I am
writing about it to create some comments and reiterate some well
known observtions.
Rape
is horrible!! It is probably the worst crime that a person could
commit. Murder is bad, but the victim does not have to live with the
result (duh!!), their loved ones have to, but not the victim. The
rape victim can never get it out of their head and their loved ones
have to live with it as well. That could be a bit worse than the
murder victim's loved ones because the loved ones do not get reminded
by the presence of the victim of thier own inability to ptrotect the
victim whenever they see them.
I
have read some stories that have some rapes in them. "Fair
Game" by Fran Gabino has a description of a rape the wrtiter
experienced in high school, as well as one from a friend's
perspective; the other was from a science fiction story (I think it
was "Redliners" by David Drake). The first gives a very
good analysis of what happened and what it meant to her: all her
'staircase thoughts': why she got in the car, why she did not fight,
why she just let it happen, etc.; as well as what all she thought
others were thinking and how she was treated. The second describes
the rape of an aquaintance of hers, another girl in school. This
story only convinced her she was the guilty party in all this.
The
science fiction story told of the girl fighting off her attacker.
The purpose of the story was to give the impression of the toughness
of the girl. It was fiction, but in real life that could happen as
well, you realize that the victim fighting off the rapist is not
necessarily so, just possible. In various action or 'kung fu' movies
the hero always wins, pretty much no matter what the odds are, but it
is fiction, in real life it is not necessarily so. Chuck Norris or
Steven Seigal would not always win a street fight. Very few rape
victims are trained in martial arts, but neither are their attackers,
so, I figure, that a rape victm might as well fight back and they may
discourage the rapist.
One
thing that the true story by Ms. Gambino emphasized was the
unexpectedness of the act, the surprise or unbelief she felt as it
happened. She was a Sophmore in high school in 1952, so it was
before all the enlightment that has since happened. I am sure,
though, even nowadays, someone being so young, all that enlightment
or consciousnes raising would be over their head or would not be
understood and they maybe even should not be forced to understand
this stuff about rape. Let them grow up, acquire the understanding
in their own good time. Sad to say that that may be too late. Maybe
just a bit of awareness that it is possible should be imparted to all
our children with the understanding that they can refuse to
cooperate. For all of us, the Boy Scout motto,'Be Prepared,' should
be part of our outlook in life.
There
is another story a rape in the press that I have not read, but heard
a bit of on the radio. What she felt afterwards was humiliation. I
can imagine the feeling. The problem is that the victim has to
ignore or overcome the feeling of humiliation. The victim has to
make the rapist own up to their crime and requires that the victim
bring it out and let others know it happened. Humiliation just gets
in the way of doing that.
Geting
back to the surprise of the rape: who would not be surprised,
especially with a date rape? How many of us would be so aware of
what was planned by the rapist was really going to happen or how far
they would go towards sexual intercourse? In some cases, like being
watched and followed through a library or store, the victim gets the
sense of what may happen, so takes evasive action. But lacking such
awareness, everything happens too fast. In any attack, surprise
gives the attacker a very great advantage. I do not know what the
best preparation to prevent or avoid rape would be, but it could not
hurt to have some imagined plan of action for yourself in the back of
your head, something to make sure the attacker will know you are not
a willing victim, 'be prepared.'
I
questioned the validity of including the following paragraph or two,
but since I wrote it I have seen reports of judges freeing rapists
because the victim did not do the rapist any physical harm, so the
victim must have been consenting.
It
can not be said too much: When you are feeling like you will be
raped, fight!! It can only show the rapist that you are aware,
making a choice and not willing. It may deter them and it may make
them mad, but at least they will know you have a mind and use it to
make choices. The most important part of the fighting back is that
it puts the victim in the position of being a real person with real
thoughts and feelings that have to be recognized as a part of what is
happening. How hard the victim fights shoiws how serious they are
about not being raped, and, alternatively, how hard the rapist tries
to contniue the rape, shows how serious they are. In the science
fiction story, the victim expected the rapist would be trying to
attack her, so she was prepared, and won. But it also has to be said
that the victim has to weigh the intangibles of how much harm will
they suffer and can they inflict, the likely outcome and is it worth
the suffering, or should they just suibmit? This thought does make
the forgoing of fighting back moot, but, really, if the rapist has a
knife or axe or wrench, do you want to try or are able to fight
against those weapons?
Given
the fact that some victims will be too surprised to fight until it is
too late or surprised at actually being raped, maybe they could take
a souvenir from or give one to the rapist, you knoe, box their ears
or bite their cheek or something. I just do not like the idea that
the rapist may get away with thinking they gave pleasure to their
victim. Two things about doing something like this: it would give
them something to remember, maybe forever, that not all rape victims
are happy about getting raped, as well as giving the police (they
will be a big help, eh?) a way to identify the rapist, and it is
something to make the victim feel like they did not let the rapist
get away with commiting this act scott free. I understand this may
not be possible by all victims, I just hope it not objected by it
being heinous or mean: what started this anyway? These victims
should be allowed to mark the rapist. I understand that two wrongs
do not make a right, but it is something the victim can do right then
and it is a way of exacting some justice. I know that the victim
should let the police deal with the rapist in the usual way rather
than taking matters into their own hands, but how many rape victims
have found the police actually comforting and useful?
Date
rape is a situation that does occur and the knowing of rapoist does
not excuse the victimizing of the rape, but the ambigiousness of the
situation needs to be claified. Back when I was in college, there
were girls who were talked of as being 'prick teases,' they would
lead the fellow on and on, then stop. Mostly that was okay, usually
it was soon enough the guy was able to accomodate the situation, but
sometimes it was not so good, hence the warning for certain girls who
would not stop soon enough. A guy should be wary of those girls, to
avoid the situation altogher. But that does bring up the question
of, in these cases, who to believe? Orw much was incited by the
female? Rape is rape and should be treated as such, but in thesde-
instances the victim has to delineate their role in what happened.
It will be hard enough to be the victim as well as the accuser of
the rapist. There will be those who will never think bad of the
rapist, therefore it is the victim's problem and they should be the
punished one. The victim will have to live with all that forever, or
as long as they commune with those folks. It is very sad to be
humiliated by being raped, then to have others treat you as if you
were the one doing wrong. But if you are going to make a rapist pay
for the crime, you have to take the proper steps to ensure that it
happens and suffer the arrows of unwarrented guilt others will fling.
This points up the worst part of being the victim: not only do you
suffer the humiliation of being raped, others may judge you badly,
and, as I said, this is may even be worse when you knew the rapist
otherwise. There is no answer for what the victim has to go through
in this regard, except , hopefully, there are those who are willing
to console and assist the victim through all this.
As
an aside, I would like to address the image that rape victims enjoy
or at least have orgasms. I, of course do not know about this at
all, but I figure that females need more stimulation and play than a
rapist would bother with; males may orgasm, but that is probably
because of stimulas/response that is part of being male and having an
orgasm does not make it any more fun. It may be said that any orgasm
feels good, but that is not necessarily so. A rape victim will only
see it as another part of their degradation.
After
the fact, the victim is left to their own devices: the rapist goes
away satisfied. The victim should not think of their role in the
rape, more to the point would be to think how to get the rapist to
own up to their act and get whatever justice the system exacts:
report the rape! The sooner the better. I have read that in Jewish
law, a rape victim is to inform the priests or whoever of authority
within three hours or something like that that rape has been
commited. I find this reasonable, after all when you are raped, you
know it RIGHT NOW!, so let
the authorities know about it. I do not know what they ask for from
the victim about what happened, but the victim has to just keep in
mind that they are the victim and it was rape, they said 'no' and
fought, etc. Whatever the cops look for may hinge more on making
sure they can prove in court the rapist did the deed, the victim
should make sure they do not try to excuse the rapist because of some
crossed signals or some other notions. The victim should not be
given the onus of proving that it was rape, that should be obvious,
but should be commiserated with that it happened and the rapist will
be punished accordingly. As for the actual court case, I will not
say much but to reiterate that the victim should not let themselves
be bullied into recanting or diminishing the rape they suffered. It
will be more humiliation: let it show or work around it or something,
but do not let it rule you or the defense may get the rapist excused
or not punished as they deserve. As a victim, remember through all
this, just keep your perspective: who was wronged? who should be
punished? are they trying to distract the court from the fact a rape
was commited? Keep the court on track to what is right, do not let
the court refocus on some side issue. Do not fault the defense for
what they do in the legal setting. A lot of lawyers see getting
their client the most success (acquitted, lessened charge or
sentence, etc.) as doing their job. I do not agree with that notion.
I figure that the defense lawyer is there to make sure the State
proves the case properly and the civil rights of the rapist are
respected, not to get the rapist off any way they can, but that is
only my opinion.
After all is said and done
and the rapist is getting punished, they or their family should not
ever complain about how the victim ruined the rapist's life by
getting the rapist convicted, the victim will have various serious
issues to deal with for the rest of their life, so their life has
already been ruined by the act of rape. The rapist's life will not
be the same, but they will get through the punishment and get on with
their life, almost like nothing happened: this will never happen for
the victim.
Comments
Post a Comment